Skip to content

Breaking in shoes

I remember shopping for trekking shoes once with a friend, who was more experienced than I was in such matters. I settled on something that looked suitably pricey/branded/affordable–a pointless endeavour since they would only be worn on mountaintops where my only audience would be a bunch of goats–and proceeded to exclaim in relief that I would no longer have to worry about footwear matters for my trip. Whereupon said experienced friend told me that I should spend at least a month wearing the shoes so that they’d be “broken in” and more comfortable for the trek. Not entirely exhilarated at the idea of having to wear the heavy things about on campus for a month (all the cool kids wore flip flops to match their fishmonger attires at lectures), I made some quip about why shoe factories didn’t employ underpaid sweat-shop kids to walk about in new shoes, breaking them in first.

I thought it was a pretty funny quip, but he didn’t laugh and rather looked at me as if I had said something stupid. He then told me that I was being silly (said friend took footwear rather seriously): breaking in shoes wasn’t about making the shoes more comfortable–it was so that your feet could grow into the shoes . Shoes didn’t magically conform to a certain person’s feet, no matter how well-made they were - only feet could grow accustomed to shoes. Just because a pair of shoes was well-worn didn’t mean they would be comfortable, unless they were well-worn because of you.

The shoe-salesperson, who was kneeling beside me, concurred and nodded sagely, and they both cast pitying gazes upon me, me who knew so little about feet and shoes.

Ha ha, so did that mean I could break in stilettos if I walked in them enough, I asked said friend in a jovial manner, trying to break the awkward silence that accompanied my embarrassment.

He replied seriously that yes, I could, but I’d probably have to go through hell first to get my feet into the correct shape (said friend possessed little humour regarding footwear, or anything else for that matter).

I remember this little incident, mainly because it was the only time I had ever been embarrassed over shoes and also because it was interesting to me that my own perceived superiority over an inanimate object–a shoe–had been erroneous. It chafed at my ego that I was in fact the subjugated party, my feet in a war of attrition that it would ultimately lose, shaped and twisted to the whims of some strips of cloth and leather.

I was humbled at the thought that my shoes were bigger than I was.

And yet, it was also a cheering reminder of the plasticity of the human body–a reminder of our ability to surmount the odds, of how adaptable we could be to even the worst of surroundings. How we, the living, could triumph over the dead, as long as we kept on walking and growing. For surely even the greatest of mountaineers, before they set off on their journeys to heights unknown–surely even they too had experienced the slight squashing of the toes and the uncomfortably tough soles.

And so, my friends, I share with you this story of shoes, and hope that you can garner some wisdom from my pain. When next you encounter a seemingly unsurmountable task, remember the parable of the shoes and know that for us, Impossible is Nothing.

Why they hate Singapore?

Recently I’ve been pretty much addicted to Reddit, a web-based news aggregator where people (with no lives) vote on newsworthy web articles. Usually the ones that catch my eye are the articles on atheism, science, technology, humour and the occasional lolcat or sleepy kitten. The politics or economics usually doesn’t interest me much, especially since I’ve gotten to the point where I realize much of the news we hear is sensationalized panic-fodder designed to get people to keep reading/watching the news.

Imagine my surprise when I stumbled upon an article about Singapore, which was in itself not surprising, but an article about why the West hates Singapore:
Why they hate Singapore
– Western detractors are getting the jitters as others copy our model
.

And to be published in the Straits Times! By a local writer! And not a freelancer, but a Straits Times veteran and former Intelligence Officer Chua Lee Hong (who frankly sounds quite dislikeable from this).

Singapore’s blogosphere has taken to the article pretty badly–Mrs Chua isn’t a very popular writer, having bad-mouthed bloggers only recently. There are a multitude of bloggers who can (and have) analyzed the article better than I can, so I won’t bother about the content.

What surprised me about the article was that the mouthpiece of our government has decided to be quite so open about not taking up a “US-centric” model of democracy and so decisively aligned itself with Big Brother China. It looks like the scales are tipping over at the offices of whoever decides our foreign policies.

Why the need to re-justify our economy’s dependance on the muzzling of personal freedoms? Wasn’t the government just promising more freedom of the press and speech recently? Wasn’t the ban on (certain) political media only just lifted today?

Is this a call to Singaporeans to find more sympathy for their Chinese compatriates? A subtle hint to us that the guys on top want us to align outselves with the mainland? Or perhaps the article was meant for foreign ears? Perhaps, as a loyal citizen I should post this on anti-cnn (which doesn’t just contain articles from CNN) to gain us brownie points? Play up my role as a scrappy little Singaporean?

Sadly, it doesn’t take much exploratory work to find out that Singaporeans aren’t very popular in the Chinese webspace at the moment. Searching anti-cnn for my little island’s name turns out flame-posts about arrogant, ignorant, stupid, over-important Signaporeans who snub mainland Chinese despite being inhabitants of a tiny, puny island that China could snuff out in a second if it wanted to (sadly, I know idiots like that). When Singapore lost at the Olympics to the Chinese team, I can imagine the guys who monitor the Chinese press over at MOFA breathing a sigh of relief–we certainly don’t need the kind of fallout that comes from beating Big Brother at his favourite game.

Sadly, Mrs Chua’s idea that “rich and powerful states” are picking up tips from our model of governance are sadly optimistic, I feel. The guys over at anti-cnn would have a few choice words for her.

Major League Eating in Singapore

In a world facing a food crisis, with prices spiraling upwards and many sufferring from hunger and starvation, Singapore hosts the Major League Eating Asia competition. World heavyweights Takeru Kobayashi and Joey Chestnut wolfed down several kilograms worth of satay, with Kobayashi eventually gorging his way to the top.

According to the media release about the launching of MLE Asia, the competition in Singapore seems to be the the first of possibly many to come:

MLE Asia franchisee, Hairi Soewarso of Thinking Tub, said that the new MLE branch would use the contest as a launching pad to sponsor more events in Asia and the Middle East, supported by the Singapore Tourism Board.

I doubt there will be any competitions in Myanmar, though.

Note MLE Asia’s chinky logo, with the bamboo font and the fist holding a pair of chopsticks incorrectly. Then again, I suppose the proper way to use chopsticks in a speed-eating competition would be to use them to spear food with.

ChannelNewsAsia has an upbeat take on the competition:

Despite Singaporeans’ love for food, it seems the nation has got a long way to go before it reaches the top of the international competitive eating game.

Personally, I think it is BECAUSE of Singaporeans’ love for food that we don’t tend to snort it up without bothering to chew (a technique mastered by champion Takeru Kobayashi). Thankfully, this practice will soon be corrected:

… coaching clinics are being set up for finalists from this year’s event so that when the competition returns next year, they will be able to pit their skills against the world’s best.

(shudder)

Why does the STB always have to support such embarrassing competitions? Does no one else want to come to Singapore? If satay is going to be portrayed as a food that is wolfed down by hand by people who don’t stop to taste, is it still worth having it portrayed?

Mercer Cost of Living Index 2008

Singapore is the 13th most expensive place to live in the world! (at least for expats)

See the report here. Incredibly, New York is cheaper for expats than Singapore. Green card, anyone?

NEA Big Read

I’m not American, but since I’ve never done one of these memes before…

The rules:

  • Bold those you have read.
  • Italicize those you have started but haven’t finished.
  • Place an asterisk by those you intend to read/finish someday.
  1. Pride and Prejudice - Jane Austen
  2. The Lord of the Rings - JRR Tolkien
  3. Jane Eyre - Charlotte Bronte
  4. Harry Potter series - JK Rowling
  5. To Kill a Mockingbird - Harper Lee
  6. The Bible
  7. Wuthering Heights - Emily Bronte
  8. Nineteen Eighty Four - George Orwell
  9. His Dark Materials - Philip Pullman
  10. Great Expectations - Charles Dickens
  11. Little Women - Louisa M Alcott
  12. Tess of the D’Urbervilles - Thomas Hardy
  13. Catch 22 - Joseph Heller
  14. Complete Works of Shakespeare
  15. Rebecca - Daphne Du Maurier
  16. The Hobbit - JRR Tolkien
  17. Birdsong - Sebastian Faulks
  18. Catcher in the Rye - JD Salinger
  19. The Time Traveller’s Wife - Audrey Niffenegger
  20. Middlemarch - George Eliot
  21. Gone With The Wind - Margaret Mitchell
  22. The Great Gatsby - F Scott Fitzgerald
  23. Bleak House - Charles Dickens
  24. War and Peace - Leo Tolstoy
  25. The Hitch Hiker’s Guide to the Galaxy - Douglas Adams
  26. Brideshead Revisited - Evelyn Waugh
  27. Crime and Punishment - Fyodor Dostoyevsky
  28. Grapes of Wrath - John Steinbeck
  29. Alice in Wonderland - Lewis Carroll
  30. The Wind in the Willows - Kenneth Grahame
  31. Anna Karenina - Leo Tolstoy
  32. David Copperfield - Charles Dickens
  33. Chronicles of Narnia - CS Lewis
  34. Emma - Jane Austen
  35. Persuasion - Jane Austen
  36. The Lion, The Witch and The Wardrobe - CS Lewis
  37. The Kite Runner - Khaled Hosseini
  38. Captain Corelli’s Mandolin - Louis De Bernieres
  39. Memoirs of a Geisha - Arthur Golden
  40. Winnie the Pooh - AA Milne
  41. Animal Farm - George Orwell
  42. The Da Vinci Code - Dan Brown
  43. One Hundred Years of Solitude - Gabriel Garcia Marquez
  44. A Prayer for Owen Meany - John Irving
  45. The Woman in White - Wilkie Collins
  46. Anne of Green Gables - LM Montgomery
  47. Far From The Madding Crowd - Thomas Hardy
  48. The Handmaid’s Tale - Margaret Atwood
  49. Lord of the Flies - William Golding
  50. Atonement - Ian McEwan
  51. Life of Pi - Yann Martel
  52. Dune - Frank Herbert (started but couldn’t get into it)
  53. Cold Comfort Farm - Stella Gibbons
  54. Sense and Sensibility - Jane Austen
  55. A Suitable Boy - Vikram Seth
  56. The Shadow of the Wind - Carlos Ruiz Zafon
  57. A Tale Of Two Cities - Charles Dickens
  58. Brave New World - Aldous Huxley
  59. The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-time - Mark Haddon
  60. Love In The Time Of Cholera - Gabriel Garcia Marquez
  61. Of Mice and Men - John Steinbeck
  62. Lolita - Vladimir Nabokov
  63. The Secret History - Donna Tartt
  64. The Lovely Bones - Alice Sebold
  65. Count of Monte Cristo - Alexandre Dumas
  66. On The Road - Jack Kerouac
  67. Jude the Obscure - Thomas Hardy
  68. Bridget Jones’s Diary - Helen Fielding
  69. Midnight’s Children - Salman Rushdie
  70. Moby Dick - Herman Melville
  71. Oliver Twist - Charles Dickens
  72. Dracula - Bram Stoker
  73. The Secret Garden - Frances Hodgson Burnett
  74. Notes From A Small Island - Bill Bryson
  75. Ulysses - James Joyce
  76. The Bell Jar - Sylvia Plath
  77. Swallows and Amazons - Arthur Ransome
  78. Germinal - Emile Zola
  79. Vanity Fair - William Makepeace Thackeray
  80. Possession - AS Byatt
  81. A Christmas Carol - Charles Dickens
  82. Cloud Atlas - David Mitchell
  83. The Color Purple - Alice Walker
  84. The Remains of the Day - Kazuo Ishiguro
  85. Madame Bovary - Gustave Flaubert
  86. A Fine Balance - Rohinton Mistry
  87. Charlotte’s Web - EB White
  88. The Five People You Meet In Heaven - Mitch Albom
  89. Adventures of Sherlock Holmes - Sir Arthur Conan Doyle
  90. The Faraway Tree Collection
  91. Heart of Darkness - Joseph Conrad
  92. The Little Prince - Antoine De Saint-Exupery
  93. The Wasp Factory - Iain Banks
  94. Watership Down - Richard Adams
  95. A Confederacy of Dunces - John Kennedy Toole
  96. A Town Like Alice - Nevil Shute
  97. The Three Musketeers - Alexandre Dumas
  98. Hamlet - William Shakespeare
  99. Charlie and the Chocolate Factory - Roald Dahl
  100. Les Miserables - Victor Hugo

Who the hell “finishes” reading the Bible?

I think I need to read more. Recently, what with Reddit and Google Reader, I haven’t touched a book that wasn’t work-related. It’s somewhat embarrassing that I haven’t read some of the ones above but seen the movie–such as Pride and Prejudice and any of the Potters’. It’s also a little embarrassing that I’ve read some of them without watching the movie–such as Bridget Jone’s Diary and Little Women.

I need to macho up my reading list. Why have I read Anne of Green Gables but not War and Peace???

More maddening is the fact that I read so much literary criticism online that I know OF all the books listed above, even if I haven’t read them. All plot-spoiled, sadly.

Sarcasm

Found this article, which I found interesting because because of my problem with sarcasm:

THE ANATOMY OF SARCASM: RESEARCHERS REVEAL HOW THE BRAIN HANDLES THIS COMPLEX COMMUNICATION .

Sadly, the article only describes the mechanisms involved in understanding sarcasm (I guess I must have quite a few friends with brain lesions) but not the mechanisms for making sarcastic statements. Of course, it’s likely to be the same parts of the brain that govern the behaviour.

So there’s hope for those with especially sarcastic partners. A simple lobotomy can make life much more enjoyable!

King Jigme Khesar Namgyal Wangchuck

I’m surprised King Jigme Khesar Namgyal Wangchuck isn’t better known in Asia. The guy is single, has a Masters from Oxford, looks like a pop-star and is the youngest head of state of the world. He’s a wise and benevolent ruler who’s overseeing his country’s peaceful path towards democracy. His country lists “Gross National Happiness” as a priority (despite the recent problems with modernization).

jigmekhesar.jpg

In other words, he’s as close as we have now to a fairytale prince.

Why don’t more Asian girls fall for him?

Although I suppose the fact that he is the ruler of one of the most Buddhist countries in the world may have something to do with it. I guess being Buddhist isn’t quite compatible with being a dream lover.

Penile length of newborns in Singapore

PubMed article from SGH on Penile length of newborns in Singapore.

I feel so violated.

SIN

It only just struck me, the first time in my life, that the airport code for Singapore is, rather ironically for a country where even chewing gum is banned–”SIN”.

Asus EEE 900

Just bought it. So far it’s been terrible to use–the keyboard has almost no tactile response at all, and typos abound. Typing anything longer than a 3-paragraph blog post is bound to result in hand-cramps, I’m almost certain. On the other hand, just marveling at its size is giving me an orgasm.